Rename the Color singleton to avoid the Qt 6.12 clash

This commit is contained in:
SirBlob committed 2026-10-09 19:22:08 -04:00
1 parent 97854006b5
commit d92290c06c
93 files changed
+342 -342

No files matched your search

+1 -1
View File
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ plugin, so summoning a panel is an IPC call into a process that is already up.
```
shell/
shell.qml entry point
Commons/ Style, Color, Border, Util
Commons/ Style, Colors, Border, Util
Ui/ shared components
services/ plugin registry, bar widget registry, app library
plugins/
+1 -1
View File
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Named keys are preferred: `background`, `foreground`, `accent`, `muted`,
`color0`..`color15` form also works and is resolved through the same cascade:
`color0` is the background, `color4` is blue, `color5` is magenta.
That cascade lives in `blob-theme-color`, and `Commons/Color.qml` mirrors it so
That cascade lives in `blob-theme-color`, and `Commons/Colors.qml` mirrors it so
the shell and the CLI never disagree about what a slot means.
## Templates
+2 -2
View File
@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ repeating literals.
The CSS was written against pywal's `@color0`, `@color4` and `@color5` aliases.
`blob-theme-color` resolves `color4` to blue and `color5` to magenta, so
`Commons/Color.qml` now exposes `blue` and `magenta` with that same cascade,
`Commons/Colors.qml` now exposes `blue` and `magenta` with that same cascade,
falling back to `accent` for themes that define neither. `color0` is
`background`, which Color already had.
`background`, which Colors already had.
## Quick settings tabs